<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Office 2010 Review: Microsoft Office 14 Technical Preview Invites Sent Out!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tnerd.com/2009/07/31/office-2010-14-review-microsoft-office-14-technical-preview-invites-sent-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tnerd.com/2009/07/31/office-2010-14-review-microsoft-office-14-technical-preview-invites-sent-out/</link>
	<description>(Technology, as it happens, When it happens!)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:24:54 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: boe</title>
		<link>http://tnerd.com/2009/07/31/office-2010-14-review-microsoft-office-14-technical-preview-invites-sent-out/comment-page-1/#comment-70060</link>
		<dc:creator>boe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tnerd.com/?p=4768#comment-70060</guid>
		<description>Nothing beneficial for most businesses - no reason to upgrade/purchase - 

Like Vista  - all bling - no function.

If they wanted to improve Office they SHOULD have -
1. Made outlook open multiple e-mail accounts as full exchange -not an additional mailbox with some functionality or pop/imap with very limited functionality but two seperate exchange profiles simultaneously from multiple exchange servers.

2. Full OLE support for pictures in access - umm wasn&#039;t that functional with Office XP - why take that out?   Why should someone have to code to add pictures to a personal database?  Might was well use oracle or a real database if you are going to have to use code.   Adding Office XP photo editor is the work around but why not just add photo editor back into office if that is the solution?

3. Offer the old menu bar for people (most of my clients) who don&#039;t want to learn the new menu bar.   You can finally modify the ribbon to some extent in 2010 however my clients just want their old ribbon bar.  Frankly I have no issue with the new menu bar but I&#039;m one person and most of my clients don&#039;t like it so prefer to stick with office 2003.  MS could make money selling the new version if they just offered the old menu as a choice with the new ribbon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing beneficial for most businesses - no reason to upgrade/purchase - </p>
<p>Like Vista  - all bling - no function.</p>
<p>If they wanted to improve Office they SHOULD have -<br />
1. Made outlook open multiple e-mail accounts as full exchange -not an additional mailbox with some functionality or pop/imap with very limited functionality but two seperate exchange profiles simultaneously from multiple exchange servers.</p>
<p>2. Full OLE support for pictures in access - umm wasn't that functional with Office XP - why take that out?   Why should someone have to code to add pictures to a personal database?  Might was well use oracle or a real database if you are going to have to use code.   Adding Office XP photo editor is the work around but why not just add photo editor back into office if that is the solution?</p>
<p>3. Offer the old menu bar for people (most of my clients) who don't want to learn the new menu bar.   You can finally modify the ribbon to some extent in 2010 however my clients just want their old ribbon bar.  Frankly I have no issue with the new menu bar but I'm one person and most of my clients don't like it so prefer to stick with office 2003.  MS could make money selling the new version if they just offered the old menu as a choice with the new ribbon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mojtaba mahmoodi</title>
		<link>http://tnerd.com/2009/07/31/office-2010-14-review-microsoft-office-14-technical-preview-invites-sent-out/comment-page-1/#comment-69927</link>
		<dc:creator>mojtaba mahmoodi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 07:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tnerd.com/?p=4768#comment-69927</guid>
		<description>i need ofice 2010</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i need ofice 2010</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mojtaba mahmoodi</title>
		<link>http://tnerd.com/2009/07/31/office-2010-14-review-microsoft-office-14-technical-preview-invites-sent-out/comment-page-1/#comment-69926</link>
		<dc:creator>mojtaba mahmoodi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 07:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tnerd.com/?p=4768#comment-69926</guid>
		<description>i want office 2010 please</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i want office 2010 please</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BeBob Esq</title>
		<link>http://tnerd.com/2009/07/31/office-2010-14-review-microsoft-office-14-technical-preview-invites-sent-out/comment-page-1/#comment-69439</link>
		<dc:creator>BeBob Esq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 17:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tnerd.com/?p=4768#comment-69439</guid>
		<description>I really don’t like the new ribbon interfaces. Microsoft is shooting themselfs in the foot over this new creation.

I still prefer free alternative office suites. There is no reason anymore to pay for an office suite these days. They have all the functionality that any general user may need.

And to make things even better for alternative office suites is that they have not converted their interfaces to a ribbon mess.

I tend to favour SSuite Office’s free office suites. Their software also don’t need to run on Java or .NET, like so many open source office suites, so it makes the software very small and efficient. [www.ssuitesoft.com]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really don’t like the new ribbon interfaces. Microsoft is shooting themselfs in the foot over this new creation.</p>
<p>I still prefer free alternative office suites. There is no reason anymore to pay for an office suite these days. They have all the functionality that any general user may need.</p>
<p>And to make things even better for alternative office suites is that they have not converted their interfaces to a ribbon mess.</p>
<p>I tend to favour SSuite Office’s free office suites. Their software also don’t need to run on Java or .NET, like so many open source office suites, so it makes the software very small and efficient. [www.ssuitesoft.com]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
