<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spamza.org: Spam or Not-Spam, You decide!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tnerd.com/2008/09/11/spamzaorg-spam-or-not-spam-you-decide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tnerd.com/2008/09/11/spamzaorg-spam-or-not-spam-you-decide/</link>
	<description>(Technology, as it happens, When it happens!)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 03:00:12 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Abbas</title>
		<link>http://tnerd.com/2008/09/11/spamzaorg-spam-or-not-spam-you-decide/comment-page-1/#comment-41735</link>
		<dc:creator>Abbas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 19:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tnerd.com/?p=1584#comment-41735</guid>
		<description>Hi Dave,

I agree with the point and the article also draws some attention to the fact that these sites are not following the 
industry standards for subscriptions.

But, that does not make the concept with Spamza is based on, any less controversial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave,</p>
<p>I agree with the point and the article also draws some attention to the fact that these sites are not following the<br />
industry standards for subscriptions.</p>
<p>But, that does not make the concept with Spamza is based on, any less controversial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpamZa!</title>
		<link>http://tnerd.com/2008/09/11/spamzaorg-spam-or-not-spam-you-decide/comment-page-1/#comment-41729</link>
		<dc:creator>SpamZa!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 16:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tnerd.com/?p=1584#comment-41729</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://tnerd.com/2008/09/11/spamzaorg-spam-or-not-spam-you-decide/comment-page-1/#comment-41728</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 16:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tnerd.com/?p=1584#comment-41728</guid>
		<description>I think the issue here is not about whether spamZa stays online or not (btw, it seems to be back with http://www.spamza.org), but the huge flaw some email marketers have in their mailing lists management.
Double opt-in was created for a reason and I can</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the issue here is not about whether spamZa stays online or not (btw, it seems to be back with <a href="http://www.spamza.org)"   rel="nofollow">http://www.spamza.org)</a>, but the huge flaw some email marketers have in their mailing lists management.<br />
Double opt-in was created for a reason and I can</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rosalie-ann Masse</title>
		<link>http://tnerd.com/2008/09/11/spamzaorg-spam-or-not-spam-you-decide/comment-page-1/#comment-41689</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosalie-ann Masse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 21:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tnerd.com/?p=1584#comment-41689</guid>
		<description>if it&#039;s down for good, why did yesterday i started being spammed from there.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if it's down for good, why did yesterday i started being spammed from there.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
